31 May 2021 to 4 June 2021
Europe/Berlin timezone

EVALUATION OF SURFACTANT AND FOAM PROCESSES FOR IN-SITU NAPL REMEDAITION IN A MILITARY BASE, SOUTH KOREA

31 May 2021, 18:00
15m
Oral Presentation (MS2) Porous Media for a Green World: Water & Agriculture MS2

Speaker

Mr Hazem Fleifel (Louisiana State University)

Description

Introduction

Surfactant and foam processes have been widely used in enhanced oil recovery from the petroleum-bearing geological formations [1, 2] and in-situ subsurface remediation from shallow formation and aquifer [3, 4].
This study investigates the potential of using surfactant and foam processes for the in-situ remediation of shallow subsurface NAPL phases within a field in a US/Korea military base, South Korea. It consists of two major components: the first is a history matching of surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation treatment and the second is a prediction of follow-up foam injection treatment. The site has a 5 m x 5 m treatment area with 3 m depth with 3 injection wells and 3 extraction wells.

Results

Surfactant treatment: Over 10-days surfactant treatment exhibits a partial success in terms of NAPL removal. The relatively higher-permeability area contacted by the surfactant chemicals shows a mobilization of NAPL phases because of a reduced level of capillary trapping (i.e., low dimensionless capillary number). It is the area with relatively lower-permeability values, however, that prevents a successful sweep from occurring. History matching from simulations shows why such an early breakthrough happens in some extraction wells, and what roles the subsurface heterogeneity plays in overall in-situ treatment with surfactant solution.

Foam treatment: A foam treatment, proposed as a potential follow-up action, is evaluated see if how foam can overcome subsurface heterogeneity. The outcome seems very promising such that foam can improve the sweep and increase the recovery factor over 80 - 90%. The final results are shown to vary with foam strengths as summarized by using a sensitivity analysis. Foam field test is designed in the near future.

References

[1] S.I. Kam and W.R. Rossen. A Model for Foam Generation in Homogeneous Media, SPE Journal, 417-425, (2003).
[2] M. Izadi and S.I. Kam. Investigating Supercritical CO2 Foam Propagation Distance: Conversion from Strong Foam to Weak Foam vs. Gravity Segregation, Transport in Porous Media, DOI: 10.1007/s11242-018-1125-z, (2019).
[3] A. Roostapour and S.I. Kam. Modeling Foam Delivery Mechanisms in Deep Vadose-zone Remediation Using Method of Characteristics, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 243, p. 37-51, (2012).
[4] S. Lee and S.I. Kam. Three-Phase Fractional Flow Analysis for Foam-Assisted Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) Remediation, Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 101, Issue 3, p. 373-400, (2014).

Time Block Preference Time Block A (09:00-12:00 CET)
Acceptance of Terms and Conditions Click here to agree

Primary authors

Mr Hazem Fleifel (Louisiana State University) Dr Gyu Sang Lee (Korea Rural Community Corporation) Prof. SEUNG Kam (Louisiana State University)

Presentation materials