19–22 May 2026
Europe/Paris timezone

Porosity, Selectivity, and Fouling in Desalination: A Comparative Analysis of Reverse Osmosis and Thermal Processes

21 May 2026, 15:35
1h 30m
Poster Presentation (MS05) Physics of multiphase flow in diverse porous media Poster

Speaker

Amine Belhadj Mohamed (Higher Institute of Computer Science, Mahdia – University of Monastir, Tunisia.)

Description

Conventional methods of desalination work mostly on reverse osmosis and thermal processes. In a traditional reverse osmosis process, separation between water and salt is accomplished through the use of semi-permeable membranes with nanometer-sized pores. Even though this provides high selectivity coefficients, it can be considered a disadvantage in terms of increased susceptibility to membrane fouling as a result of the presence of salts, organic materials, and suspended particles. Fouling will cause a gradual reduction in permeate flux rates, elevated operating pressures, increased energy use, and periodic cleaning. On the other hand, thermal desalination by evaporation and subsequent condensation is not reliant on semi-selective membranes for the separation of the salts. In cases involving porous materials, the porosities are known to be higher, and the purpose is mainly to facilitate the transfer of heat and mass. A comparison between the porosity used in osmotic desalination and that used in the process of thermal desalination brings into consideration a fundamental compromise between the principles of selectivity and efficiency. It is within this context that the value added within the new system is based on the aspect of preventing the problem of fouling as well as maintaining a high level for separation efficiency. The idea is to make the system more sustainable.

References [1] Li, D. & Wang, H. (2010). Recent developments in reverse osmosis desalination membranes. Journal of Materials Chemistry. [2] Orfi, J., Sherif, R. & AlFaleh, M. (2025). Conventional and Emerging Desalination Technologies: Review and Comparative Study from a Sustainability Perspective. Water 17(2):279.
Country Tunisie
Acceptance of the Terms & Conditions Click here to agree

Author

Amine Belhadj Mohamed (Higher Institute of Computer Science, Mahdia – University of Monastir, Tunisia.)

Co-author

Mrs Sghaier Nour (High Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir, University of Monastir, Monastir 5000, Tunisia.)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.