InterPore2023

Microscopic transport and phase behaviors of CO2 injection in heterogeneous formations using microfluidics

24 May 2023, 12:30

15m

Oral Presentation (MS11) Microfluidics and nanofluidics in porous systems MS11

Speaker

Dr Yaohao Guo (East China University of Science and Technology; University of Toronto)

Description

CO2 injection into the geological formations is a promising option to enhance oil recovery while simultaneously contributing to carbon storage. Conventional core tests provide critical insights but still leave ambiguous transport mechanisms due to the limitation of real-time visualization. This study aims to directly observe the multiphase flow behaviors and phase change in CO2 injection at pore-scale using microfluidics. Our all-in-one chip design provides a universal platform to reproduce various CO2 injection strategies in the formation with permeability contrast, including flooding and huff-n-puff processes, and integrated a rapid measurement of minimum miscibility pressure (MMP). Miscible injection eliminates the capillary force in immiscible scenario, and promotes stable film-wise displacement with a higher recovery rate and an attenuated heterogeneity impact. We find that effective huff-n-puff operations require a sufficient gas concentration to generate bubbles and an adequate pressure gradient to push the dissolved gas displacement, which supports the importance of high depressurization rate from both physical phenomenon and inherent mechanism. Huff-n-puff re-energizes the reservoir after immiscible flooding through deep gas-oil interactions and induces a considerable growth in cumulative recovery. These micromodel results can significantly improve our fundamental understanding on detailed multiphase transport phenomena in CO2 injection and help to optimize implementation schemes.

References

[1] Smirnova E, Kot S, Kolpak E, Shestak V. Governmental support and renewable energy production: A cross-country review. Energy. 2021;230:120903.
[2] Looney B. Statistical Review of World Energy, 2020. Bp.
[3] Guo Y, Zhang L, Zhu G, Yao J, Sun H, Song W, et al. A pore-Scale investigation of residual oil distributions and enhanced oil recovery methods. Energies. 2019;12(19):3732.
[4] Zhu G, Kou J, Yao B, Wu YS, Sun S. Thermodynamically consistent modelling of two-phase flows with moving contact line and soluble surfactants. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2019;879:327-359.
[5] Acheampong AO. Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: what causes what and where? Energy Economics. 2018;74:677-692.
[6] You J, Ampomah W, Sun Q, Kutsienyo EJ, Balch RS, Dai Z, et al. Machine learning based co-optimization of carbon dioxide sequestration and oil recovery in CO2-EOR project. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;260:120866.
[7] Zhong J, Abedini A, Xu L, Xu Y, Qi Z, Mostowfi F, et al. Nanomodel visualization of fluid injections in tight formations. Nanoscale. 2018;10(46):21994-22002.
[8] Zhou X, Li X, Shen D, Shi L, Zhang Z, Sun X, et al. CO2 huff-n-puff process to enhance heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage: An integration study. Energy. 2022;239:122003.
[9] Sheng JJ. Critical review of field EOR projects in shale and tight reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2017;159:654-665.
[10] Sheng JJ. Enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs by gas injection. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2015;22:252-259.
[11] Zuloaga P, Yu W, Miao J, Sepehrnoori K. Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs. Energy. 2017;134:181-192.
[12] Rezk MG, Foroozesh J, Zivar D, Mumtaz M. CO2 storage potential during CO2 enhanced oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2019;66:233-243.
[13] Guo Y, Zhang L, Yang Y, Xu Z, Bao B. Pore-scale investigation of immiscible displacement in rough fractures. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2021;207:109107.
[14] Zhou X, Yuan Q, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zeng F, Zhang L. Performance evaluation of CO2 flooding process in tight oil reservoir via experimental and numerical simulation studies. Fuel. 2019;236:730-746.
[15] Torabi F, Firouz AQ, Kavousi A, Asghari K. Comparative evaluation of immiscible, near miscible and miscible CO2 huff-n-puff to enhance oil recovery from a single matrix–fracture system (experimental and simulation studies). Fuel. 2012;93:443-453.
[16] Nguyen P, Carey JW, Viswanathan HS, Porter M. Effectiveness of supercritical-CO2 and N2 huff-and-puff methods of enhanced oil recovery in shale fracture networks using microfluidic experiments. Applied energy. 2018;230:160-174.
[17] Lu H, Huang F, Jiang P, Xu R. Exsolution effects in CO2 huff-n-puff enhanced oil recovery: Water-Oil-CO2 three phase flow visualization and measurements by micro-PIV in micromodel. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2021;111:103445.
[18] Zhang K, Jia N, Liu L. CO2 storage in fractured nanopores underground: Phase behaviour study. Applied Energy. 2019;238:911-928.
[19] Zhang K, Jia N, Li S, Liu L. Static and dynamic behavior of CO2 enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs: Experimental nanofluidics and theoretical models with dual-scale nanopores. Applied Energy. 2019;255:113752.
[20] Li L, Sheng JJ, Su Y, Zhan S. Further investigation of effects of injection pressure and imbibition water on CO2 huff-n-puff performance in liquid-rich shale reservoirs. Energy & fuels. 2018;32(5):5789-5798.
[21] Bai H, Zhang Q, Li Z, Li B, Zhu D, Zhang L, et al. Effect of fracture on production characteristics and oil distribution during CO2 huff-n-puff under tight and low-permeability conditions. Fuel. 2019;246:117-125.
[22] Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Lei X, Zhang Y, Song Y. CO2 flooding enhanced oil recovery evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging technique. Energy. 2020;203:117878.
[23] Tang W, Sheng JJ. Huff-n-puff gas injection or gas flooding in tight oil reservoirs? Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2022;208:109725.
[24] Hoffman BT. Huff-N-Puff gas injection pilot projects in the eagle ford. Conference Huff-N-Puff gas injection pilot projects in the eagle ford. SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference. OnePetro, 2018
[25] Gogoi S, Gogoi SB. Review on microfluidic studies for EOR application. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 2019;9(3):2263-2277.
[26] Nguyen P, Mohaddes D, Riordon J, Fadaei H, Lele P, Sinton D. Fast fluorescence-based microfluidic method for measuring minimum miscibility pressure of CO2 in crude oils. Analytical chemistry. 2015;87(6):3160-3164.
[27] Qiu J, Tang W, Bao B, Zhao S. Microfluidic-based in-situ determination for reaction kinetics of hydrogen peroxide decomposition. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021:130486.
[28] Molla S, Magro L, Mostowfi F. Microfluidic technique for measuring wax appearance temperature of reservoir fluids. Lab on a Chip. 2016;16(19):3795-3803.
[29] Huang F, Xu R, Jiang P, Wang C, Wang H, Lun Z. Pore-scale investigation of CO2/oil exsolution in CO2 huff-n-puff for enhanced oil recovery. Physics of Fluids. 2020;32(9):092011.
[30] Bao B, Feng J, Qiu J, Zhao S. Direct measurement of minimum miscibility pressure of decane and CO2 in nanoconfined channels. ACS omega. 2020;6(1):943-953.