Speaker
Description
Geological carbon sequestration (GCS) in subsurface media is one of promising approaches to alleviate excessive CO2 emission [1], while saline aquifers are ideal GCS sites [2, 3]. Generally, four trapping mechanisms including: structural/stratigraphic trapping, residual trapping, solubility trapping and mineral trapping are proposed for GCS in saline aquifers [4, 5]. Among them, structural trapping plays a dominant role in the early stage of GCS, during which CO2 can be sealed in porous media thanks to the capillary pressure between CO2 phase and water phase [6, 7], which is dependent on CO2-water-rock contact angle. It is reported that clay minerals such as kaolinite, account for a large proportion in caprocks. Thus, the knowledge about CO2-water-kaolinite contact angle is of great importance for CO2 structural trapping.
Kaolinite is a typical 1:1 type clay, consisting of one tetrahedral sheet and one octahedral sheet, which are known as siloxane and gibbsite surfaces, respectively [8]. Previous experimental and computer simulation studies [9-12] have shown that kaolinite gibbsite surface is hydrophilic, while siloxane surface is moderately hydrophobic [12]. Although these studies offer general understanding about CO2-water-kaolinite contact angle, they have notable limitations. For example, it is extremely challenging to distinguish kaolinite surfaces in experiments, while the kaolinite surfaces used in experiments are often coated with quartz [11] and soil [9], and sample qualities are highly dependent on their preparation processes [13].
While CO2-water-kaolinite contact angle on two kaolinite basal (gibbsite and siloxane) surfaces has been heavily studied [14], the contact angle on kaolinite edge surface remains unclear. Bickmore et al. [15] reported that the ratio of kaolinite edge surface area to total surface area can be up to ~50%. The water-edge surface interactions, interfacial water structures, and edge surface wettability still remain unknown. Kaolinite edge surface is not atomically flat [16, 17], while surface wettability is also dependent on surface roughness [18]. To the best of our knowledge, kaolinite edge surface wettability in CO2-water-kaolinite system has not been reported yet.
Thus, in this work, we use molecular dynamics simulations to investigate kaolinite gibbsite and edge surfaces wettability in CO2-water-kaolinite systems and elucidate the effect of interfacial water structures at a typical GCS condition (330 K and 200 bar). We find that both gibbsite and edge surfaces are strongly water-wet, while CO2-water-kaolinite contact angle (i.e., 180°) on edge surface is even larger than that of gibbsite surface (i.e., 153°). Due to strong surface atomistic heterogeneity, water thin films with muti-layered hydration structures emerge on edge surface by forming complex hydrogen bonding networks and deplete CO2 molecules from the surface. On the other hand, in the presence of CO2 molecules, water thin films on gibbsite surface consist of single water adsorption layer.
Collectively, our work provides important insights into the dependence of water thin films and interfacial water structures on surface heterogeneity and their effects on surface wettability in CO2-water-kaolinite systems, enhancing fundamental understanding about CO2 structural trapping for GCS.
References | [1] J. Song, D. Zhang, Comprehensive review of caprock-sealing mechanisms for geologic carbon sequestration, Environ Sci Technol 47(1) (2013) 9-22. [2] Z. Ma, P.G. Ranjith, Review of application of molecular dynamics simulations in geological sequestration of carbon dioxide, Fuel 255 (2019). [3] D. Zhang, J. Song, Mechanisms for Geological Carbon Sequestration, Procedia IUTAM 10 (2014) 319-327. [4] N.M. Burnside, M. Naylor, Review and implications of relative permeability of CO2/brine systems and residual trapping of CO2, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 23 (2014) 1-11. [5] CCP, CO2 Trapping Mechanisms, 2015. https://www.co2captureproject.org/co2_trapping.html. [6] M. Arif, A. Barifcani, M. Lebedev, S. Iglauer, Structural trapping capacity of oil-wet caprock as a function of pressure, temperature and salinity, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 50 (2016) 112-120. [7] P. Hosseininoosheri, S.A. Hosseini, V. Nuñez-López, L.W. Lake, Impact of field development strategies on CO2 trapping mechanisms in a CO2–EOR field: A case study in the permian basin (SACROC unit), International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 72 (2018) 92-104. [8] L. Zhang, X. Lu, X. Liu, K. Yang, H. Zhou, Surface wettability of basal surfaces of clay minerals: insights from molecular dynamics simulation, Energy & Fuels 30(1) (2016) 149-160. [9] J. Shang, M. Flury, J.B. Harsh, R.L. Zollars, Comparison of different methods to measure contact angles of soil colloids, Journal of colloid and interface science 328(2) (2008) 299-307. [10] S. Wang, I.M. Edwards, A.F. Clarens, Wettability phenomena at the CO2-brine-mineral interface: implications for geologic carbon sequestration, Environ Sci Technol 47(1) (2013) 234-41. [11] B. Pan, C. Gong, X. Wang, Y. Li, S. Iglauer, The interfacial properties of clay-coated quartz at reservoir conditions, Fuel 262 (2020) 116461. [12] X. Yin, J.D. Miller, Wettability of kaolinite basal planes based on surface force measurements using atomic force microscopy, Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 29 (2012) 13-19. [13] I.W.R. Saputra, O. Adebisi, E.B. Ladan, A. Bagareddy, A. Sarmah, D.S. Schechter, The influence of oil composition, rock mineralogy, aging time, and brine pre-soak on shale wettability, ACS omega 7(1) (2021) 85-100. [14] C.M. Tenney, R.T. Cygan, Molecular simulation of carbon dioxide, brine, and clay mineral interactions and determination of contact angles, Environ Sci Technol 48(3) (2014) 2035-42. [15] B.R. Bickmore, K.L. Nagy, P.E. Sandlin, T.S. Crater, Quantifying surface areas of clays by atomic force microscopy, American Mineralogist 87(5-6) (2002) 780-783. [16] X. Liu, X. Lu, R. Wang, E.J. Meijer, H. Zhou, H. He, Atomic scale structures of interfaces between kaolinite edges and water, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 92 (2012) 233-242. [17] A. Kremleva, S. Krüger, N. Rösch, Uranyl adsorption at (010) edge surfaces of kaolinite: A density functional study, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75(3) (2011) 706-718. [18] K. Seo, M. Kim, Re-derivation of Young’s equation, Wenzel equation, and Cassie-Baxter equation based on energy minimization, Surface energy, IntechOpen2015. |
---|---|
Country | Canada |
Conference Proceedings | I am not interested in having my paper published in the proceedings |
Acceptance of the Terms & Conditions | Click here to agree |